🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, may align so closely with the mythologized version promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state de facto.

• His list included various figures, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as James Bond. His harder version prompted local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to examine.