🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."