🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for him, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.